Cantonese Voice Benchmark 2026.1 · 0 entrants
Every claim below carries how strongly the data supports it. A benchmark that refuses to publish a ranking over noise cannot then publish prose at uniform confidence, so it does not.
The data supports this directly and the gap exceeds the noise.
The direction is clear. The sample is thin.
We looked and cannot yet say.
No entrant has completed the speech pillar. 0 entered it.
What would change this Enough entrants completing human evaluation to compare synthesis rather than describe its absence.
Who entered each pillar, and who finished it. The gap between the two columns is usually the more interesting number.
| Pillar | Entered | Scored |
|---|
These findings are generated from the score table, not written by hand, so they change as the edition does. Anything graded open is an absence of evidence rather than evidence of absence — most often it means not enough entrants finished a pillar for a comparison to mean anything.
The methods behind every number, including the exact text normalization applied before scoring, are on the methodology page. The per-entrant results are on the leaderboard.